Cookies on Knowhow Nonprofit

We use cookies in order for parts of Knowhow Nonprofit to work properly, and also to collect information about how you use the site. We use this information to improve the site and tailor our services to you. For more, see our page on privacy and data protection.

OK

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Social impact bonds

How to finance public sector social outcomes with investment from the private sector – a type of social investment

What does it mean?

Social Impact Bonds (SIB) are a form of outcomes-based contracts between the public and private sector. The former agrees to pay for substantial improvement in social outcomes for a specific population, which will reduce the public sector’s costs in the long run. The private sector initially pays for intervention, which is delivered by service providers with a proven track record. The private sector will only be repaid if a significant social impact is achieved. 

Who might use it?

If a charity or social enterprise is able to demonstrate its high social impact, it may be able to collaborate with a financial intermediary to attract external finance through an SIB. 

  • The civil society organisation provides the service to the target population, which aims to reduce future public sector costs.
  • Private funds will finance the intervention, delivered by an organisation with a good track record.
  • The public sector pays for improved social outcomes that result in public savings as these bonds are based on the theory that early intervention can help prevent subsequent serious problems.
  • Unlike traditional bonds, SIBs do not have a fixed rate of return; financial return depends on the achievement of specific social outcomes set at the start of the bond issue. The higher the social impact, the higher the return earned by the private sector. It is, therefore, important to choose effective and proven  civil society organisations.

The civil society organisation bears no financial risk as the repayment is between the public and private sector; the only risk borne is reputational. SIBs provide upfront funding for prevention and early intervention services. The public sector pays if (and only if) the intervention is successful. Therefore, SIBs re-allocate the risk between the public and private sector. 

The case study below explains an SIB, however, as this is the first SIB pilot, this form of investment still does not have a proven track record. Furthermore, new types of SIBs are now emerging with different underlying structures. 

Who provides it?

Social Finance provides a range of financial advisory services to raise capital through robust investment propositions.

Case study - Social Impact Bond

After receiving investment support from Impetus Trust, St Giles Trust, a charity which provides access to housing, training and jobs for ex-offenders, went on to work with Social Finance to develop the first Social Impact Bond (SIB).

This Social Impact Bond was launched in 2010, and has been designed to reduce re-offending amongst male prisoners leaving HMP Peterborough who have served a sentence of less than 12 months. During this pilot, experienced social sector organisations, including St. Giles Trust, The Ormiston Children and Families Trust, SOVA and YMCA will provide intensive support to 3,000 short-term prisoners over a six year period, both inside prison and after release through the ONE Service programme.

Social Finance raised £5m from 17 social investors to fund this work, which is new money into the sector. The investors are mostly charitable trusts and foundations, some of which are the giving vehicles of high net worth individuals or private banks.

If this initiative reduces re-offending by 7.5%, or more, investors will receive a share of the long term savings to the Government from the Ministry of Justice. If the SIB delivers a drop in re-offending beyond this threshold, investors will receive an increasing return the greater the success at achieving the social outcome, up to a maximum of 13%. However, if reoffending isn’t reduced by at least 7.5% the investors will receive no recompense at all. Returns will be decided by comparing the number of reconvictions for the One Service cohort compared to a similar group of short sentenced male prisoners across the UK.

While this is a model which is yet to be proven, this first year report from Social Finance, Social Impact Bonds: The One Service. One Year On demonstrates an encouraging level of uptake for the service. Whether the SIB will reduce reoffending enough to generate a return for investors will be revealed in year four of the programme.

Find out more about Social Finance’s work on Social Impact Bonds.

Page last edited Oct 22, 2015

Comments (1)

to post a comment
Hector Gonzalez
Hector Gonzalez on Aug 25, 2012 06:47 PM

First came the LIHTC (Low Income Housing Tax Credit). Now comes the Social Impact Bond. How sick are we as a society that the we longer "put up or shut up"? Thanks to our warped priorities (war, corporate welfare, subsidizing failed agricultural systems, etc.) the money we used to spend on improving our society (New Deal kind of money) is no longer available. So we turn to the private sector, to the companies and corporations that are at fault for so much of what ails our society! And we agree to funnel them public dollars at high rates of returns? "Great" I suppose for those "proven" non-profit entities (how many of them are just gatekeepers, propping up this failed economic system that we live under?) but where will the money come from to support those cutting edge and unproven start-ups. This becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy! Society continues to crumble thanks to the greed and corruption manifest in our for profit corporations. Well-intentioned non-profits with proven track records wanting to increase their presence to combat the effects of corporations then contract with the municipality and the source of the problem (the corporation) for money to grow their program. Us taxpayers then pay outrageous rates of return to the corporation(s) when the program (which has already proven to be effective) succeeds. The band-aid approach allows us to stumble along for a few more years but does absolutely nothing to get at the root of the problem. The government, seeing this "success" quickly decides that it can further reduce the meager amount of public dollars that it currently provides (CDBG funds for instance) and funnel the balance into more corrupt and ineffective corporate welfare schemes. This is nothing more than the continued externalizing and privatizing of the government's responsibility. Government exists to fix problems that are too big for individuals or small groups of individuals to tackle on their own. What are we doing to everything we hold dear when we substitute the word "corporation" for the word "government" in my last sentence? This funding source represents the height of everything that is wrong with our society! Wake up people!

1 star 2 stars 3 stars 4 stars 5 stars 2.9/5 from 1088 ratings

Find out how-to…

How-tos are written by our users to share practical knowledge.

And if there isn't one already you can write it yourself, or request someone else write it.

See all how-tos